Hello... Mutiara, How are you? ^ ^

Hai everyone

I'm feeling great mazdaa...

Hello

Yes...i am ready...🥳🥳🥳

Yeah Of course, I'm ready 😁

I think Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".

I think Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies.

what about you mazda? what do you think about cencorship?

I think censorship is a deletion or absence of an activity or other thing that can be covered up due to an error in the implementation of an activity

Wow, that's amazing guys!

I agree with your explanation of censorship, guys. It's pretty awesome

I think censorship is a bad thing

or bad thing?

I think censorship is very good because there are many things that must be censored, especially in social media, films, soap operas and other television media. because if there is no censorship then things that should not be seen are seen as bad things about fighting, murder, drunkenness and other bad behavior. Moreover, censorship is the forcible deletion of part or all of information material to be published or broadcast, or acts of warning or warning that are threatening from any party, and or the obligation to report, and obtain permission from the authorities, in carrying out journalistic activities. So from here, there are several things that are the cause of the censorship being used to not spread the disgrace of others and have a bad impact on the community at large.

I think censorship is good, because with censorship, it will limit users from content that is not age appropriate and with censorship it can also protect copyright.

To me,it’s a bad thing. By censoring things that offend/upset you,you are essentially censoring real life. Real life is not a disney movie,by the way. It is often brutal,weird&not pretty,or ‘cute’ or cuddly,etc. BUT,it’s still part of life,no matter if people like it,or not. Same thing goes for words. I wish people would grow up&get over it,already. Words only upset you&have power over your feelings,if you let them. ‘Fuck’. There,a ‘bad’ word. Did it physically hurt or kill anyone,when I typed it? No,it did not. And censoring movies,is just plain silly. It’s not your TVs job to monitor what your kids watch,it is YOUR job,as a parent. If you don’t want your kids watching certain things,fine,but don’t screw it up for everyone else,by demanding censorship on what they watch,too. Why censor movies anyway? We pretty much all know what was said,or done. It’s pointless. We do not live in a bubble of softness&G-rated sweetness,as much as some people would like to think so,or want it to be so. I wish people would understand that&get over it.

In my opinion censorship is a good thing, because it can cover up mistakes made during reporting. For example, if at the time of reporting there was a conversation that accidentally brought down the other party, censorship really needed to cover up this mistake. Because if there is no censorship, there will be a fight that will result in a fight between the parties

however, apart from having a good impact, I think censorship also has a bad impact or can cause harm such as the emergence of a more powerful group, freedom of speech is restricted, censorship costs a lot of money, censorship can also limit promotion opportunities for some people.

Yapps....I am agree with your argument Mutiara

Yeah, thank you sivi

In my opinion, as long as what is censored is an act that should not be done, censorship is a good action. However, if the complaints and voices of the public are censored, censorship is a wrong act

In my opinion, this goes back to each country. Because each country must have a different level of interest and privacy.
There are countries that feel protected by bad news of their country being censored and there are countries that feel less agree if their country's problems are covered up. Back to the country's needs and needs regarding censorship

it goes back to the people of each country. some argue that the purpose of censorship is good and some do not agree with censorship itself.
However, from some opinions agree if the payment is made in the sense that it is done correctly. because it exists to help protect people and keep them safe from bad things. If used properly, the sensor is very good. However if you use it in the wrong way or excessively then you will only harm society as a whole.

So, it can be concluded that whether or not a country's laws are strict against censorship depends on the needs of each country. If censorship is used properly, the sensor gonna be really good. However if you use it in the wrong way or excessively then you will only harm society as a whole.

In my opinion social media sites censor their own users because their users make mistakes or violations but there are also social media that censor their users because the videos sent are violent otherwise the videos are not violent. So social media should be more thorough and sophisticated as well in the future.

Komentar ini telah dihapus oleh pengarang.

Wow, that's really interesting, isn't it, guys? Okay, finally we come to this last question. Here we go ^ ^

wow what an amazing answer aisa and mutiara ....
i also agree with their opinion..why social media censor its own users. this can happen due to several things, for example users are under 18 years old while social media content has entered 18+, or users commit violations such as spreading violent, sexual or other videos.

In my opinion, censorship or censorship should not be used in every event or event. Censorship is better used only occasionally. Because not all things need to be censored and covered. For example, if there is a serious accident that is photographed and then published, this is better censored. Because there are elements of things that cause discomfort to what is published. Another example is movies or pictures that contain pornography. This is better censored because in the era of many small children who have become more sophisticated following the current development of the times. So these pornographic things should be censored for children within a certain age limit for viewers. However, I don't think censorship should be used for things like pointing out a criminal. Because if we censor the perpetrators, it is the same as protecting the identity of the perpetrators of the crime, and many other people do not know who committed the crime. If there is no censorship, we can know and be more aware of who the perpetrators and motives of these crimes are. Could be the perpetrator, regardless of the prisoner and happened to be around us.

I think censorship is necessary but only for some things that really need censorship... such as things that contain cruelty or sexuality.

Censorship is broadly and generally a negative. However, it’s impossible to give a definitive, binary answer and say all censorship is bad.

Attempting to be as neutral and objective as possible, there are a few examples where censorship is likely a good thing (net social benefit):

Censoring extremely profane, graphic or violent things, particularly from children
Censoring someone when their expression and/or action is intended to hurt, intimidate or oppress other people, particularly when said expression imposes restrictions on that group or person’s freedoms. Generally, if your freedom imposes on the freedom of others, it may not be a defensible instance of freedom (although the causality here can become very complex and challenging very quickly. There are likely things we do in our everyday lives (i.e., purchase a cup of coffee) that might have very negative, far-off externalities in another country)
Actually committing or attempting to commit real crimes
However, in almost every case, it can be very challenging to draw the line even here (in terms of precisely defining what is / isn’t being censored, why and how), particularly when it comes to modes of expression like art.

For the most part, we’re best off collectively by adopting the classic “I hate what you say but I’ll defend your right to say it“ approach to censorship. Even if you look at the First Amendment in the U.S. Constitution, there’s no specific hate speech clause or commentary. The generally established (but still debated and rarely enforced) exceptions in case law are:

Immanent incitement to commit immediate illegal activity
Speech that would immediately prompt violence
Solicitation to commit a crime or speech that constitutes a crime, such as defamation or violently threatening a federal official
In the 1990’s, roughly 300 colleges and universities adopted hate speech codes and rules. Every time one ended up being challenged in court those censorship restrictions were ruled unconstitutional.

Different countries — compare the U.S. to Germany or Germany to China, Russia or Iran — also have very different baseline operating understandings and standards for censorship. For example, in the U.S., you can publicly talk about Nazism in ways that are expressly forbidden in Germany.

As I’ve written about before in greater length, it’s also worth pointing out that there are at least four different prominent types of censorship:

Communication censorship – restrictions on freedom of speech, expression and the right to peacefully assemble
Information censorship – restrictions on free, independent press and freedom for digital packet flow, processing and switching across the Internet. this would also extend to information infrastructure, including underlying protocols. closely related to communication censorship in many cases.
Asset or financial censorship – restrictions on financial freedoms and asset or property ownership; power consolidation and inequality
Identity censorship – restrictions and censorship that attack the equal treatment and freedom of one or more people based on their race, gender, age, sexual identity or religious beliefs (though it certainly gets problematic when two ore more of them end up at odds)

Hope we can discuss back with a different topic, guys^^

You are Wellcome mazdaa😊

Siapp Mazda thank you❤️